<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pinot Noir=Oregon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.youngberghill.com/2013/01/20/pinot-noiroregon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.youngberghill.com/2013/01/20/pinot-noiroregon/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=pinot-noiroregon</link>
	<description>Winemakers/Vineyards</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 14:46:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl Giavanti</title>
		<link>http://www.youngberghill.com/2013/01/20/pinot-noiroregon/#comment-175</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl Giavanti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 18:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://youngberghill.com/?p=4255#comment-175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with you both, and respectfully submit that California producers truly believe in both the quality of their wines and the value of tourism. We&#039;ve already established quality here in Oregon. Heading down the path of promoting wine tourism seems inevitable.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you both, and respectfully submit that California producers truly believe in both the quality of their wines and the value of tourism. We&#8217;ve already established quality here in Oregon. Heading down the path of promoting wine tourism seems inevitable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne Bailey</title>
		<link>http://www.youngberghill.com/2013/01/20/pinot-noiroregon/#comment-174</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne Bailey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 19:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://youngberghill.com/?p=4255#comment-174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I totally agree with your comments, Phil.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree with your comments, Phil.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Fouke</title>
		<link>http://www.youngberghill.com/2013/01/20/pinot-noiroregon/#comment-173</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Fouke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 00:08:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://youngberghill.com/?p=4255#comment-173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The key to Oregon wines is the fact that California wine is about tourism, but Oregon wine is about the wine itself. This is, in my opinion, what sets Oregon apart. It seems to me that pooling advertising money and spending it carefully in both commercial and trade publications will spread the cost so as to maximize the effectiveness. It also behooves us all, when travelling outside Oregon, to further spread the word by urging places to which we travel to stock and serve our wines.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The key to Oregon wines is the fact that California wine is about tourism, but Oregon wine is about the wine itself. This is, in my opinion, what sets Oregon apart. It seems to me that pooling advertising money and spending it carefully in both commercial and trade publications will spread the cost so as to maximize the effectiveness. It also behooves us all, when travelling outside Oregon, to further spread the word by urging places to which we travel to stock and serve our wines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
